Sunday, February 12, 2012

• WHEN ACTIVISM BECOMES LEGALISTIC & OBSESSIVE

You might enjoy this - maybe, maybe not. A friend - or a contact anyway - on Facebook chastised me for watching, daring to laugh at and posting a link to a Saturday Night Live sketch (actually, it wasn't even a link to SNL, but to the Huffington Post), because he is a crusader against watching ANY television apparently. Have look:


So many conservatives watch SNL, Jay Leno, etc... not even thinking twice that they are helping generating ad revenue for GE... who in turn spends enormous sums on electing marxist a-holes like Obama (among other things)... From the wildly popular book, I have yet to write
"And THAT Virginia is how we got a marxist in the white house

    • Maryann Maccione Dodd And am I correct in that they pay little in taxes?
      10 hours ago ·
    • Joe Dan Gorman ‎'little' as in 'almost none' on billions of income.

    • Kevin Chittick I love that book (I have yet to read) "I have yet to Write"
      @Maryann is that a tease for the squel? Can't wait!!!

    • Joe Dan Gorman We're paying to have our own asses kicked...and outside of San Francisco...that's pretty sick!

    • Terri Gordon I don't watch the crap, nor do I go to movies that feature the ignorant commies.
    • Elder Reed I quit watching all thos just for that reason JD, even cancelled my HBO anbout five years ago when Bill Maher went on a rant about some asshat agenda item of the lefts. You are right, hell I won;t even watch some movies because of who the star.....

    • Tom Martin Very good Point Joe Dan, I boycott ALL movies with the Likes of Brad Pitt, George Clowney etc... As a matter of fact I watch very few movies anymore and concentrate on educational programming. Compromising your country for Entertainment is NOT an Option, $$$ you spend at the Movie Houses ends up right in the Pockets of the Marxist comes election time.

    • Lee Golden I for one do not.
    • Ellen Schaefer I don't watch either..never have!
    • Cheryl Barone Sweeney haven't watched since the mid 80's. not funny

    • Peggy Baker I too abandoned SNL and Leno years ago. I do not like mean spirited humor. I don't think we should always have to be PC, but most of the leftists feel they have to get mean ant personal. Nah!

    • Jimmy Z Zulz
      The current cast is VERY funny - easily the funniest since the days of Kevin Nealon, Dana Carvey, Dennis Miller, David Spade, Adam Sandler etc. Over the past few weeks, I've seen them rip on Al Sharpton, Obama, and some pretty big liberal icons in addition to our side of the aisle. Diversion from the serious matters at hand is very important, and Kenan Thompson doing Al Sharpton is just splendid.
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/11/saturday-night-live-al-sharpton-msnbc_n_1141929.html
    • Joe Dan Gorman Jimmy Z... are you fking pimping GE products on my wall? What the hell kind of 'conservative' promotes a Communism---which GE is. You are helping them raise money! Ad revenue! This is pure dumbass---paying someone to kick your own ass. NEVER POST LIBERAL SHIT ON MY WALL AGAIN> Comprende...
    • Joe Dan Gorman Yeah, GREAT Idea... how about contributing to Socialism as a 'diversion'--- Holy Cow...
    • Joe Dan Gorman You'd best be careful how you respond... I'm in no mood for someone who promotes socialist products on my wall.

    • Jimmy Z Zulz
      I watched most of the show last night, and I saw no socialism. The media is what it is. I don't take a hardline approach because I know everyone needs to laugh and be diverted. Do you have a TV in your house? I do. Do you pay for cable? I don't. Not a penny of MY money goes to the cable companies that distribute much more crap than SNL dishes out.

      I've promoted your material on my show, daily on my show. EVERY show has a Joe Dan Media ad within it. I have advised you that I'd like to have a new ad for your new project(s). I have done nothing but support you and what you are trying to achieve.

      But on this we disagree. Your warnings about how I should respond, what I can post in response - I find that troubling. Attacking me with the F word - that's conservatism I suppose? It's the OTHER side of the aisle, saying what can and cannot be 'American'. Joe Dan, you're talking to me as if I'm an enemy of yours. Either lighten up, or block my ass, but I won't be censored by Obama, Facebook, or Joe Dan Gorman.

      I doubt you'll be able to read my comment without blowing a cork, so I'll send it privately as well. But for those who are receiving this as an email notification, I don't see any reason for Mr. Gorman to lash out as he has. I've had him on my show, we spent a lot of time talking about his music and that show is still available in the archives.

      Anyway, that's that. Block me if you must, censor my comments, delete them, whatever you gotta do. But I have never done anything like that to anyone for disagreeing with me. On Facebook, via email and on my show, I WELCOME disagreement. It gives me an opportunity to strut my debate abilities. Perhaps you should hone up.
    • Joe Dan Gorman We,ve had this discussion before JZ.... You are Not going to SEE socialismm...DUH... But you are damn sure FUNDING it. They OWN the fking Network... who do you think gets the revenue? Thats how they DUPE dumbasses... Put an American Face on the Communist Product... And you are in the MEDIA and don't or cannot grasp this?
    • Jimmy Z Zulz I watch CBS more often. Love Person of Interest. But I still love your work and I still want a new ad for your newest project to play on my show. I'm a fan of what you do.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz And I'm not kissing your behind. I like your work, very much.
    • Lash LaRue And CBS is better? LOL... Thats insane.

      Joe Dan is dead on... everytime you tune in (via any digital means) ---you are counted, and become the raw data with which their advertising dollars are PAID. This is not even debatable.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Lash, CBS News broke the Fast and Furious story and still takes the lead on most of the details coming out. Credit where credit is due. Do you have a TV?
    • Lash LaRue So because CBS occasionally cover a story [which is SUPPOSED to be their JOB] and pretend/act like they MIGHT be American... its okay to generate revenue for them? WTH?
      If you did not read Joe Dan's piece "MEDIA 101: Information Traffickers and The Art of Perception"----you really should.

      And yes I do have a TV...
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Lash, I'm not saying any such thing. You don't want to watch, don't.
    • Lash LaRue Maybe not with words...but your actions damn sure do. And I don't watch...
      Unlike YOU---I don't call myself a conservative and support socialism.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Do you pay for cable?
    • Joe Dan Gorman Paying for cable is NOT even REMOTELY a calculable factor when determining viewership--- or ANY type of value-based market shares [which we all know determine and effect market value of any particular network's advertising rates].

      If it DID---no cable show would ever get canceled.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Paying for cable supports all kinds of left wing cable networks, including msnbc.
    • Joe Dan Gorman So does banking at Bank of America, eating at The Olive Garden..and buying ANYTHING in California.... There are all kinds of enterprises that support Leftwing crap too...the list is endless. But that is changing the subject.

      We're discussing advertising revenue from promoting programs... any network's BREAD & BUTTER. Cable fees pale in comparison... and have NOTHING to do with advertising rate calculations.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz
      ‎1 person watching a link on the internet - how much revenue does that generate? I don't bank at BofA, and I don't eat at the Olive Garden and the related restaurants. Love the Red Lobster, but won't eat there anymore. So, how much revenue is generated by clicking a link vs. how much goes to - say - HBO if you like their fare? And Lash hasn't answered yet. We have to add up the numbers, because one click isn't much, but many people clicking adds up. Same for the cable fees. Many people paying for basic cable that includes MSNBC, even if they don't watch it, adds up to a lot of money.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz How much does MSNBC get from advertising AND cable fees? Enough to pay Rachel Maddow $12.5 million.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Here's an article that cites ESPN (part of ABC) getting $2/subscriber/month. That's not chicken feed.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz MSNBC: "that the channel received an average rate of 70 cents per subscriber per month" stateofthemedia.org/2011/cable-essay/
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Here's the link with the number for ESPN
      http://abovethecrowd.com/2010/04/28/affiliate-fees-make-the-world-go-round/
      abovethecrowd.com
      “The clock on the wall's moving slower My heart it sinks to the ground And the storm that I thought would blow over Clouds the light of the love that I found” – Fool in the Rain, Led Zepp...

    • Joe Dan Gorman Fight for 'em Jimmy! Thats fine. Support your socialists elsewhere though pal....

      MSNBC was an indirect recipient of Bailout Money---which further proves my point... I'm done.
      One click don't matter is a cop out.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz That's the point - I DO NOT pay a penny for television.
    • Joe Dan Gorman Thats the attitude that put a Marxist in the White House --- nice job! Keep the dream alive!
    • Jimmy Z Zulz I get all my HDTV and about 19 channels I think - through the airwaves. Digital wave broadcasting.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz What attitude? I challenge all cable subscribers to stop supporting the communists.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Now what?
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Never got an answer from Lash.
    • Joe Dan Gorman QUit changing the subject---You are promoting Liberal/Socialists sites... You did it here. You do it all the time. Be proud Comrade... Obama appreciates your efforts
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Joe Dan, it's all the same subject.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz You can't pay for cable and support these outlets with your own cash money and point the finger at me for posting a link.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz I'm off to the grocery.
    • Joe Dan Gorman Its not the same subject at all... You "JZ} are actively, knowingly and 'publicly' PROMOTING socialists by 'publicly' providing LINKS to these ACTIVELY-SOCIALIST websites for other people to click.
      End of story. Call it what you want.

      But it does not change the fact that YOU are contributing to the INCOME of the enemy. ---which, by the way....makes YOU MY enemy too.
    • Jimmy Z Zulz Joe Dan, so block me. I'll be happy to take this whole stupid dialogue to my show and explain why I no longer will play ads for Joe Dan Media. Your call, hypocrite. You pay for cable? You're supporting them ALL. I'm done here. Simmer down and talk to me with decency, or block me. You're not MY enemy for disagreement, but I won't have my ability to express myself limited by anyone. Thanks for playing.

1 comment:

  1. On the one hand, there is an argument for trying to avoid enriching the Progressives by blocking their products from your life. I do sympathize with the goal. On the other hand, by going all PURIST, you run the risk of appearing too fundamental. You know what I mean - it frightens people off. I'm prone to that myself Joe Dan.

    Andrew Breitbart has adopted the HAPPY WARRIOR approach. It's better to involve yourself - offer an opposing point of view. Don't retreat, get right in there with the left and their hold on Hollywood etc. BREITBART'S BIG HOLLYWOOD is taking on Hollywood contemporaneously...........he is a culture warrior.

    I absolutey loathe MSNBC, but it is a treasure trove of what the Progressives are soon to promote. I'll give you an example: Up With Chris Hayes is an absolutely - fall off the chair, young Marxist type show! Lately, they keep bringing up their hatred of
    THE WAR ON DRUGS. Yesterday, they called it THE WAR ON BLACK NEIGHBORHOODS.

    Can you imagine what they would suggest to cash strapped states and their sympathetic President?
    Hey, the incarceration of all these folks is really just an overzealous attack on black neighborhoods! Release them - it's social justice!

    Basically, I'm thinking it is sure peculiar that MSNBC keeps bringing this up. I hope someone in the Conservative opposition is prepping a response, just incase this theme bubbles up to the surface. They talk of the prison industrial complex as some sort of Jim Crow type plot??? O.K. Throwing the jail doors open - releasing a predatory, substance abusing segment out to destabilize an already stressed out republic - that boys and girls is an old revolutionary plank. Old as the hills.
    Release the cats amongst the pigeons. Destabilize, overburden and collapse.

    Another theme: Boy that Constitution is an old, out of date document! This is scary. It's been suggested way too often. Conservatives have to get right in there, before this ploy takes hold. All the left media want is an AMEN CHORUS.

    Providing backers of the left (like GE) comes from advertising revenue - like Joe Dan says - but most comes from mutual funds (union investment). It's complicated. Try to avoid TV, but don't fret over every penny. Stay engaged in what the culture is doing - engage with your own viewpoints - don't retreat!

    BTW.........Who would have thought that Victoria Jackson (former SNL star) would have turned out to be so brave? Her persona is so goofy, but in reality her real life stance is both brave and patriotic! (There's a Communist in the White House) Her and Dennis Miller, who would have guessed? Good for them!

    Stay engaged Joe Dan.....we need you.

    ReplyDelete